WHY saca HER?
A sentence of the Monza Court improves the belwilderment in a delicate field as the life. A husband bereft of the paternity right because the wife decides the termination of pregnancy without tell it to the husband..
The judje proved she is right; the husband asks the separation and the compensation for damages.The possbility to be born is denied to a son, to a father is denied the possibility to oppose to the abortion.
Accordino to the rule 194,that presents some positive aspects to improve, relative to the protection of the motherhood and the support to the woman with problems in front of the pregnancy not accepted, the woman decides on her own.
An upsetting responsibility to assume: as mother she has the power of life or death on her son..
A sigh to the past presents us the woman as an angel, closed in her home, forced and exploitei. Today,, for a social redemption, she works however with jobs full of difficoulties, even if more satisfying... not in governmental powers!!..look at the tables of the political, economic, cultural meetings, there are only mister!!
If it need to choose is accept or deny a life, only the woman can decides because in her we recognize an unquestionable power. Her will to decide the termination of the pregnancy leaves out of consideration her husband.
We must ask ourself if the paternity is worth less than the other agreements between the couple in other field. For the woman this is a decision or really wanted or undertaken without an objective evaluetion of her responsibility, accordino to a freedom that doesn’t include a real freedom that creates the life. It is a choice that conditions sorrowfully her life forever. A choice that, not respecting the sacredness of being, sees a “victorious”mother on a helpless fetus vibrant with life that will be denied.